Netto Supermarkt
24 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Brandenburg 1
07.08.2022
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Burg 2
28.05.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Deutschland 3
17.04.2023
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Düsseldorf 4
30.06.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Good Management. Interesting tasks. Fair payments. Good future prospects. Recommendable workplace.
Geltow 5
15.10.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Greifswald 6
01.07.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Below-average salary. Beneficial career. Satisfactory employment site.
Hamm 7
11.11.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 8
01.12.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Below-average salary. Beneficial career. Reasonable job provider.
Germany 9
27.01.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 10
26.05.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 11
31.05.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 12
22.03.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Satisfactory staff work. Acceptable service. Excellent employer.
Germany 13
07.06.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Below-average salary. Average recognition. Employers with criticisms.
Germany 14
27.11.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Satisfactory staff work. Interesting tasks. Fair payments. Good future prospects. Satisfactory employment site.
Germany 15
16.06.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Satisfactory staff work. Interesting tasks. Fair payments. Good future prospects. Satisfactory employment site.
Krakow 16
12.05.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Krakow am See 17
17.07.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Krakow am See 18
12.05.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Magdeburg 19
05.08.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Magdeburg 20
10.10.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Magdeburg 21
01.05.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Interesting tasks. High payments. Best career opportunities. Excellent employer.
Stavenhagen 22
30.05.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. High payments. Rickety ladder of success. Satisfactory employment site.
Stavenhagen 23
10.02.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Satisfactory staff work. Interesting tasks. Fair payments. Best career opportunities. Recommendable workplace.
Wustermark 24
11.03.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
